# Gumlet vs Voomly (2026): which to pick · VSLBench > Source: https://vslbench.com/compare/gumlet-vs-voomly ## Gumlet vs Voomly Pick Gumlet if you run paid traffic and want the cheapest branded host that still fires Meta and Google retargeting pixels; pick Voomly if you want to turn videos into cheap interactive lead-capture funnels and can live with billing you have to watch. By [Marcus Vale](/authors/marcus-vale), Lead reviewer. Reviewed by the VSLBench editorial desk. Last updated 24 September 2026, and rechecked with prices every 90 days. **Disclosure:**We may earn a commission when you buy through links on this page. It never affects our rankings. You are down to two, and on a pricing page they look like siblings: both host your video behind a clean, branded, ad-free player, both cost a fraction of a Wistia bill, and both promise more than plain hosting. Gumlet and Voomly are built for different buyers, though, and this comparison is about where they genuinely part. This site judges video tools through a direct-response lens: does the player move viewers past the pitch, and can you prove which traffic bought. Neither of these two is a VSL player in the way a Vidalytics is, and neither scores a split test on the sale. But between them, Gumlet is the closer fit for a paid-traffic marketer. It is the only one of the pair that fires native Meta and Google pixels, so non-buyers become a retargeting audience, and it is the cheaper door, with a Free Forever tier and a $6 Creator plan. Where Voomly answers back is the player itself. It is genuinely more marketing-shaped than most hosts at this price: it turns any video into an interactive funnel, with a squeeze player that captures emails, an Interactive Video Closer with surveys, lockers and CTAs, branching in-video funnels, and engagement heatmaps. Gumlet is really a fast delivery CDN with marketing pixels bolted on; Voomly is really a funnel builder with hosting attached. Below we put the two side by side on price, delivery, funnel tools and analytics, then say plainly who each one is for. One more name belongs on this page, because both of these tools share the same blind spot. Neither scores a split test on the sale or attributes revenue, so a paid-traffic VSL cannot prove with either which traffic actually bought. TrackPlay is a newer specialist built around exactly that gap: it decides split tests on the cart-verified sale and posts that sale back to your ad account server-side. Gumlet still wins this two-way head-to-head, but we put TrackPlay beside both below so the reader whose whole business is the sales letter can weigh it. Quick answer Pick Gumlet if you run paid traffic and want the cheapest branded host that still fires native Meta and Google retargeting pixels, delivers fast adaptive 4K on a global CDN, and can lock content down with DRM; pick Voomly if you want to turn videos into cheap interactive lead-capture funnels, with a squeeze player, branching in-video funnels and engagement heatmaps, and you can live with billing you have to watch and no native ad pixels. One more option belongs on this page for a specific reader. If your whole business is a paid-traffic sales letter and you need to prove which traffic actually bought, not just fire a pixel on a page load, weigh TrackPlay against both. It is the newer specialist built to decide split tests on the cart-verified sale and post that sale back to your ad account, and we compare it beside these two below. * **Gumlet.** The cheaper, delivery-first host that still retargets. A Free Forever tier, then $6 a month on Creator (billed annually) that removes branding and switches on Google and Meta pixel tracking, with CRM integrations, VAST ad tags and dynamic watermarks higher up and Widevine and FairPlay DRM as a $99 a month add-on. Fast adaptive 4K and HDR on a global CDN, with 3,000GB of bandwidth on every paid tier. What it does not do is the direct-response job: no split test scored on sales, no per-second retention and no revenue attribution, and its review base is thin and aging with a January 2025 outage on the record. * **Voomly.** The cheap, marketing-shaped funnel host. Made by the Doodly and Toonly team, it turns any video into an interactive funnel: an in-video squeeze player that captures emails, an Interactive Video Closer with surveys, lockers and CTAs, branching funnels, engagement graphs and heatmaps, and a 4K HDR ad-free branded player. A free Light tier, Basic at $9 a month, and unlimited videos and bandwidth from $19\. What it does not do: no A/B test scored on sales, no revenue attribution, and no native ad pixels. Billing and cancellation are its loudest complaint, at Trustpilot 2.9 across 74 reviews. * **TrackPlay.** Best when you need attribution tied to the actual cart-verified sale. Decides split tests on the verified sale with real statistics and fires the conversion server-side to Meta, TikTok and GA4, from $29 a month with a free tier. It is narrow by design: not a general host, a retargeting-pixel CDN or a video creation suite. ### Gumlet vs Voomly at a glance Prices and plan features checked on the vendors' own pages on 23 September 2026\. TrackPlay is the direct-response specialist we line these two up against, so it wins the conversion rows and sits out the general-hosting ones. | Feature | Gumlet | Voomly | TrackPlay | | --------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | | What it is | A cheap, delivery-first video host with ad pixels | A cheap in-video funnel and creation host | A paid-traffic VSL player and attribution platform | | Built for | Cheap branded hosting with fast delivery and retargeting | Turning any video into a lead-capture funnel cheaply | Tying every play to the cart-verified sale | | Starting price | Free Forever, then $6/mo (Creator, annual) | Free Light tier, then $9/mo (Basic) | $29/mo, billed by plays | | Free tier | Yes, Free Forever (60 storage mins) | Yes, Voomly Light (5 videos) | Yes, no-card free plan (1,000 plays/mo, watermarked) | | VSL player controls | In-player CTAs and forms, no smart autoplay | Ad-free 4K HDR player, no smart autoplay or dummy bar | Sound-first autoplay, timed CTAs, watch gates | | In-video funnels and lead capture | In-player CTAs and forms | Squeeze player, Interactive Video Closer, lockers, surveys, branching funnels | Lead forms over video, timed CTA cards | | A/B testing | No | No | Yes, decided on the cart-verified sale | | Ad-platform tracking | Meta and Google pixels (browser) | No native ad pixels | Server-side to Meta, TikTok and GA4 | | Retention analytics | Per-video play stats | Engagement graphs, heatmaps, geography | Per-second, split by buyers vs non-buyers | | Revenue attribution | No | No, engagement only | Yes, revenue per play plus cart postbacks | | Content protection | Widevine and FairPlay DRM ($99/mo add-on), domain and geo blocking, dynamic watermarks | Domain restriction, no DRM | Domain-locked hosting, access controls | | Bundled and extra tools | VAST ad tags, CRM integrations, image optimization | Doodly, Toonly, Talkia on Cloud ($49/mo) | No, its focus is attribution | | Delivery and quality | Adaptive 4K and HDR, global CDN, 3,000GB bandwidth included | 4K and HDR ad-free player, unlimited bandwidth from Plus $19 | Adaptive streaming under one embed | | Pricing model | Free plus flat plans, then per-GB overages; DRM a $99/mo add-on | Flat plans, unlimited bandwidth from Plus $19 | Billed by plays, every feature on every plan | | Independent reviews | Thin and aging (Trustpilot \~78, few recent) | Loud billing complaints (Trustpilot 2.9/74) | Very new, thin outside proof, invite-only | | Best for | Cheapest branded hosting with ad pixels and DRM | Cheap in-video lead funnels and the creation suite | Paid-traffic VSLs measured on the cart-verified sale | ### Strengths and trade-offs Gumlet asks you to accept a thinner, aging review base and a real outage on its record in exchange for the cheapest branded hosting with native ad pixels; Voomly asks you to accept loud billing and cancellation complaints in exchange for genuine in-video funnel tooling at a low price. Those are the two trade-offs. #### Gumlet: what works, what to watch Gumlet video-hosting page headed "Video hosting that's fast, ad-free, and secure" above a screenshot of its video library dashboard with Upload Video, Create Folder and Analytics controls ##### What works * Cheapest branded entry point here: a Free Forever tier, then $6/mo (Creator, billed annually) that removes branding and switches on Google and Meta pixel tracking * Marketing hooks most cheap hosts skip: Meta and Google pixels, CRM integrations, VAST ad tags, and in-player CTAs and forms * Strong protection for paid content: Widevine and FairPlay DRM, domain and geo blocking, dynamic watermarks and expiring access tokens * Fast adaptive 4K and HDR playback on a global CDN, with 3,000 GB of bandwidth included on every paid tier ##### What to watch * No direct-response conversion measurement: no sales-scored A/B tests, no watch-depth pixel to prove retention, and no revenue attribution, so a paid-traffic VSL cannot prove which traffic buys * A January 2025 platform update knocked embedded videos offline for many accounts for 12 hours or more, and support reviews are inconsistent, some calling it days-slow * DRM is a $99/mo add-on on top of the plan, and bandwidth and storage overages bill per GB, so a high-traffic offer outruns the cheap sticker price * The dashboard has a learning curve and the WordPress and Elementor integrations are less polished than users want * The third-party review base is thin and aging (Trustpilot sits at 78 reviews, only a handful in the last year) #### Voomly: what works, what to watch Voomly homepage headed "Create, Host, And Launch High-Converting Videos" with a Try Voomly For Free button ##### What works * A genuinely marketing-shaped toolkit for the price: an in-video squeeze player that captures emails, an Interactive Video Closer with surveys, lockers and CTAs, and branching in-video funnels, all by swapping the player * Cheap to start and generous on limits: a free Voomly Light tier, Basic at $9/mo, and unlimited videos and bandwidth from the $19/mo Plus plan up * Engagement analytics most cheap hosts skip: engagement graphs, heatmaps and geography, device and browser breakdowns * A 4K and HDR ad-free player with custom branding, colours, chapters and timestamps * The $49/mo Voomly Cloud plan bundles the wider creation suite (Doodly, Toonly, Talkia, People Builder and Pyks) if you make explainer and animation video too ##### What to watch * Billing and cancellation are the loudest complaint: Trustpilot sits at 2.9/5 across 74 reviews with 36% one-star, and users report being charged after cancelling and hunting for the right cancellation path across separate Voomly, Doodly and Cloud portals * No split test scored on sales and no revenue attribution, so a paid-traffic VSL cannot prove which traffic actually bought; it is a funnel host, not a conversion optimizer * Thin independent proof for the Voomly product itself: the 4.2/5 G2 score spans the whole Voomly family (Doodly, Toonly and the rest), while the Voomly product page carries only two reviews * The 14-day trial auto-charges the card unless you cancel, and BBB lists Voomly LLC as not accredited, so treat the trial as a paid one you can still stop * Users report a buggy, unintuitive first-time login and setup, and compatibility gaps with external course tools like LearnDash #### TrackPlay: the paid-traffic VSL pick TrackPlay homepage, headline "The VSL player built to convert, not just play", with an "Analytics for paid-traffic VSLs" label and stats for video start time, ad platforms tracked and sound on first impression Gumlet and Voomly share one blind spot, and it is this site's first criterion: neither scores a split test on the sale or attributes revenue, so on a paid-traffic VSL you cannot prove with either which traffic actually bought. Gumlet fires a Meta or Google pixel on the page load and Voomly fires none, but a page-load pixel does not know whether the viewer bought. If that is the whole reason you are choosing a player, there is a third tool worth putting on the table. TrackPlay is a VSL player and analytics platform built for paid-traffic funnels. On the front end it holds attention with sound-first autoplay, timed CTAs and watch gates. On the back end it draws per-second retention split into buyers and non-buyers, with hook rate, hold rate and revenue per play, so you can see the exact seconds to cut or protect. Where it goes further than either of these is attribution. The cart posts the verified sale back onto the play that earned it from seven direct-response processors, including ClickBank, ClickFunnels and Digistore24, server to server, and TrackPlay fires that conversion server-side to Meta, TikTok and GA4 so the ad platform learns from the actual sale rather than a page-load pixel. Its split tests are decided on that cart-verified sale with real statistics, a z-test with a p-value and a confidence interval, and every variant runs under one embed so your ad links and campaign learning never reset. It bills by plays rather than bandwidth, every feature ships on every paid plan, and there is a no-card free plan of 1,000 plays a month plus a 14-day trial, with paid plans from $29 a month. ##### What works * Split tests are decided on the cart-verified sale, with a real z-test, p-value and confidence interval, and every variant runs under one embed so ad links and campaign learning never reset * Server-side conversion tracking to Meta, TikTok and GA4 fires on the watch-time milestone you choose and dedupes browser and server events, so the ad platform optimizes on the actual sale rather than a page-load pixel * Cart postbacks tie each sale to the play that earned it from seven direct-response carts, including ClickBank, ClickFunnels and Digistore24, server to server * Per-second retention split into buyers and non-buyers, with hook rate, hold rate and revenue per play * Every feature ships on every paid plan and billing is by plays, with a no-card free plan of 1,000 plays a month and a 14-day trial; paid plans start at $29 a month ##### What to watch * Narrow by design: built for paid-traffic VSL conversion, it is not a general video host or a B2B content library, so it has none of the channels, SEO pages or webinar tooling of a Wistia and is a poor fit if the video's job is content marketing rather than a direct-response sale * Very new, with thin outside proof: the testimonials are on its own site, there is little third-party review or Reddit footprint yet, and signup is currently invite-only, so you cannot lean on independent validation before you commit paid traffic. That is what you would expect of a platform this recent ##### Where TrackPlay is not the answer It is narrow by design. TrackPlay is built for paid-traffic VSL conversion, not general hosting or content marketing, so it is not a video host or a B2B content library and it has none of the channels, SEO pages or webinar tooling of a Wistia. If the video's job is content marketing and feeding leads into a CRM rather than a direct-response sale, it is the wrong tool. It also does not try to be a cheap delivery CDN or a creation suite the way these two do: it has nothing like Gumlet's image optimization and studio-grade DRM for a large media library, or Voomly's Doodly and Toonly bundle for making explainer video, so if that is your job Gumlet is the cheaper host and Voomly the cheaper funnel-and-creation kit. And it is very new, with thin outside proof: the testimonials are on its own site, there is little third-party review footprint yet, and signup is currently invite-only, which is what you would expect of a platform this recent. If you want an established host you can read the reviews on today, both of these have been shipping longer. Pilot TrackPlay on one funnel and reconcile the numbers against your own cart before you trust it with a launch. [Visit TrackPlay](https://trackplay.io) for the current plans and the free tier. ### Pricing, tier by tier Gumlet is the cheaper host at the door, and it has a genuine free tier. Free Forever gives you 60 minutes of storage with Gumlet branding. Creator is $6 a month billed annually and is the plan most people start on: it removes the branding and turns on Google and Meta pixel tracking. Higher tiers add CRM integrations, VAST ad tags and dynamic watermarks, and every paid tier includes 3,000GB of bandwidth. Two costs scale beyond the sticker: bandwidth and storage bill per GB once you pass the included allowance, and Widevine and FairPlay DRM is a separate $99 a month add-on, not part of any plan. Voomly starts cheap on features too, and its higher tiers are unusually generous. It has a free Light tier limited to 5 videos, then Basic at $9 a month, and from the $19 Plus plan it gives unlimited videos and bandwidth. The interactive funnel tools, the squeeze player and the engagement analytics are what you are paying for rather than raw delivery. The $49 Voomly Cloud plan is a different proposition: it bundles the wider creation suite, Doodly, Toonly, Talkia, People Builder and Pyks, so it only makes sense if you also make animated and explainer video. The trial is 14 days and auto-charges the card unless you cancel, so budget for it as a paid trial you can still stop. On running cost the two are close at the bottom and diverge on what you get. Gumlet is free or $6 to start and is really a delivery CDN with marketing pixels on top; Voomly is free or $9 and is really a funnel builder with hosting attached. If you push a lot of bandwidth, Voomly's unlimited-from-$19 model can undercut Gumlet's per-GB overages on a high-traffic library, while Gumlet's included 3,000GB and image optimization suit a large, fast-delivery catalogue. Neither charges you to run an A/B test on sales, because neither can. TrackPlay prices differently again, and it is worth a line because it changes the model. It bills by plays rather than storage or bandwidth, so a high-traffic sales letter is metered on views watched, not gigabytes served, and there is no per-GB overage to watch. Paid plans start at $29 a month with every feature on every plan, and there is a no-card free plan of 1,000 plays a month (watermarked) plus a 14-day trial of the paid features. Gumlet and Voomly are cheaper at the door; TrackPlay's case is not that it is the cheapest but that the plays model removes the overage surprise while it does the attribution work neither of the other two attempts. ### The verdict Between these two, pick on the job. Gumlet wins for this site's core reader because it is the closer fit for paid traffic. It is the cheaper door, with a Free Forever tier and a $6 Creator plan, and it is the only one of the pair that fires native Meta and Google pixels, so the non-buyers you paid to reach become a retargeting audience. Fast adaptive 4K delivery and studio-grade DRM round it out. Two honest limits stay attached to the pick: a January 2025 update knocked embedded videos offline for many accounts for 12 hours or more, which on a live paid offer is burned ad spend, and its independent review base is thin and aging, so pilot it before you point a launch at it. Voomly wins when the job is building cheap interactive lead-capture funnels rather than feeding an ad platform. It turns any video into a funnel by swapping the player: an in-video squeeze player that captures emails, an Interactive Video Closer with surveys, lockers and CTAs, branching in-video funnels, and engagement heatmaps, on a 4K HDR ad-free branded player. It starts free on Light, runs $9 on Basic, and gives unlimited videos and bandwidth from the $19 Plus plan, and the $49 Cloud plan bundles the Doodly and Toonly creation suite if you make explainer video too. The catch you must accept is its billing: Trustpilot sits at 2.9 across 74 reviews, with users reporting charges after cancelling and a trial that auto-charges the card, so treat the trial as a paid one you can still stop. It also fires no native ad pixels, which only bites if you run paid traffic. The tie-breaker: if you run ads and want the cheapest host that retargets, buy Gumlet; if you want to build in-video lead funnels cheaply and value the creation suite, buy Voomly. There is a third call for one specific reader. If you came here because your whole business is a paid-traffic sales letter and proving which traffic bought is what you actually need, look at TrackPlay before you commit. It decides split tests on the cart-verified sale with real statistics and fires that sale back to Meta, TikTok and GA4 server-side, so the ad platform optimizes on the purchase rather than a page-load pixel. It is the newer, narrower specialist and its outside proof is still thin, so pilot it on one funnel first. For hosting a large library cheaply with retargeting pixels, or for building in-video lead funnels, this does not change the answer: that is Gumlet for delivery and pixels, or Voomly for the funnel builder. Our pick ### Gumlet Gumlet is the pick if you want the cheapest branded video host that still ships marketing pixels and piracy protection, and you do not need a VSL player's conversion measurement. There is a Free Forever tier, and Creator is $6 a month billed annually, which already removes the branding and turns on Google and Meta pixel tracking. Higher tiers add CRM integrations, VAST ad tags, dynamic watermarks and Widevine and FairPlay DRM (a $99 a month add-on). What it does not do is the direct-response job: there is no split test scored on sales, no second-by-second retention heatmap and no revenue attribution, so on a paid-traffic sales letter you cannot prove which traffic buys. It is a strong, cheap host for courses, e-commerce and SMB embeds. Just weigh the January 2025 embedded-video outage and the inconsistent support before you move a revenue-critical offer onto it. ### Frequently asked questions Is Gumlet or Voomly better? It depends on the job. Gumlet is the closer fit for a paid-traffic marketer, because it is cheap, delivers fast 4K worldwide, and is the only one of the two that fires native Meta and Google pixels for retargeting. Voomly is better if you want to turn videos into interactive lead-capture funnels, with a squeeze player, branching in-video funnels and engagement heatmaps, and you are not relying on ad pixels. Neither scores a split test on the sale, so on a features grid they look level; the difference is whether you want a delivery host that retargets or a funnel builder with hosting attached. Which is cheaper, Gumlet or Voomly? At the very entry, Gumlet, and it has a genuine free tier. Its Creator plan is $6 a month billed annually against Voomly's $9 Basic, and both offer a free tier (Gumlet's Free Forever with 60 storage minutes, Voomly's Light with 5 videos). Voomly changes the maths higher up: from its $19 Plus plan it gives unlimited videos and bandwidth, which can undercut Gumlet's per-GB overages on a high-traffic library. And Gumlet's studio-grade DRM is a $99 a month add-on, so if stopping downloads matters that pushes Gumlet's real cost well past Voomly's. Can either one run a video sales letter for paid traffic? Partly, and neither fully. Gumlet fires native Meta and Google pixels and has in-player CTAs and forms, so it can retarget and prompt action, but it has no smart autoplay and no A/B testing. Voomly has a squeeze player, in-video CTAs and branching funnels, so it captures leads well, but it fires no native ad pixels and runs no A/B tests. The catch is shared: neither scores a test on sales or attributes revenue, so with either you still cannot prove which traffic actually bought. For that, a dedicated VSL player is the better tool. Is Voomly's billing really a problem? It is the loudest complaint against Voomly, and worth taking seriously on a paid offer. Trustpilot sits at 2.9 out of 5 across 74 reviews, with 36% one-star, and users report being charged after cancelling and struggling to find the right cancellation path across separate Voomly, Doodly and Cloud portals. The 14-day trial also auto-charges the card unless you cancel, and BBB lists Voomly LLC as not accredited. None of that means the product does not work, but it does mean you should treat the trial as a paid one you can stop, cancel through the correct portal, and keep the receipts. Which one has better in-video marketing tools? Voomly, clearly, if in-video marketing means funnels and lead capture. It turns any video into an interactive funnel: a squeeze player that captures emails, an Interactive Video Closer with surveys, lockers and CTAs, branching in-video funnels, and engagement heatmaps. Gumlet's marketing hooks are thinner: in-player CTAs and forms, plus the native Meta and Google pixels Voomly lacks. So the split is real. Voomly does more inside the player; Gumlet does more to feed your ad account. Which matters more depends on whether your growth comes from paid ads or from list-building. What if I need to prove which paid traffic actually bought, not just fire a pixel? Then look at TrackPlay alongside these two, because neither Gumlet nor Voomly answers it. Gumlet fires a Meta or Google pixel on the page load and Voomly fires none, but a page-load pixel does not know whether the viewer bought. TrackPlay is built around the cart: it posts the verified sale back onto the play that earned it from seven direct-response processors, decides its split tests on that verified sale with a real z-test and confidence interval, and fires the conversion server-side to Meta, TikTok and GA4\. It is very new with thin outside proof and is currently invite-only, so pilot it on one funnel and reconcile against your own cart before you trust it with a launch. ### Sources #### Other sources 9 discussions and reviews read for this page. Quotes are excerpts; open a link to read the original in context. 1. \[\] [Gumlet video hosting (vendor) ](https://www.gumlet.com/) Blog 2. \[\] [Gumlet pricing (vendor) ](https://www.gumlet.com/pricing/) Blog 3. \[\] [Voomly home (vendor) ](https://www.voomly.com/) Blog 4. \[\] [Voomly pricing (vendor) ](https://www.voomly.com/pricing) Blog 5. \[\] [TrackPlay (vendor) ](https://trackplay.io) Blog 6. \[\] ["Too unreliable for anything serious" (AppSumo review) ](https://appsumo.com/products/gumlet-video/reviews/too-unreliable-for-anything-serious-em-336991/) Capterra 7. \[\] [Gumlet on Trustpilot ](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/gumlet.com) Trustpilot 8. \[\] [Voomly on Trustpilot (2.9/5, 74 reviews) ](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/voomly.com) Trustpilot 9. \[\] [Voomly reviews on G2 (4.2/5) ](https://www.g2.com/products/voomly/reviews) G2 ### Related reading * [Our full Gumlet review](/reviews/gumlet) * [Our full Voomly review](/reviews/voomly) * [Gumlet vs Spotlightr: the cheapest host with ad pixels or a finished course platform](/compare/gumlet-vs-spotlightr) * [Panda Video vs Voomly: a protected VSL host or a cheap in-video funnel builder](/compare/panda-video-vs-voomly) * [Vidalytics vs Voomly: a real VSL player or a lead-capture funnel host](/compare/vidalytics-vs-voomly) * [Voomly alternatives, ranked by the job](/alternatives/voomly) * [The best VSL players and conversion video software](/best) * [All head-to-head comparisons](/compare) --- We may earn a commission when you buy through links on this page. It never affects our rankings. © 2026 VSLBench. Independent and reader-supported.