Head to head
Gumlet vs Uscreen
One is the cheapest branded way to host and embed a pre-recorded video, with the Google and Meta pixels a paid-traffic marketer needs already built in; the other is a platform for running a subscription video business, with a Netflix-style catalog, branded apps and a community. The pick turns on whether you are hosting one video or building a membership.
You are down to two, and the first thing to see is that they solve different problems. Gumlet is a video host: it stores your video, transcodes it, serves it fast off a global CDN in adaptive 4K, and hands you a brandable player with Google and Meta pixels, in-player CTAs and lead forms already available. It charges very little to start, from a Free Forever tier. Uscreen is a business in a box: it turns a video library into a subscription membership, with a Netflix-style catalog, native live streaming, a community space and, on its higher plans, branded mobile and TV apps its team builds for you. Both will host and play your video. They expect very different buyers.
This site judges video tools through one lens: does the player move viewers toward the sale, and can you prove what worked. On that test neither of these is a purpose-built VSL player, so the real question is which is the better home for a pre-recorded sales letter and its funnel. Here Gumlet is the closer, cheaper fit, and by more than usual for a budget host, because it fires the ad-platform retargeting pixels a paid-traffic marketer needs and lets you drop CTAs and lead forms into the player. It hosts and embeds the video cheaply and gets out of the way, leaving you to build the rest of the funnel with a funnel builder or a player on top. Uscreen expects you to build a membership site around the video, and a marketer running one sales letter to cold traffic does not want a subscription catalog, a community and an app store presence.
Where Uscreen earns its place is the job Gumlet does not chase: recurring revenue. It is a genuine membership platform, not a bolt-on. Subscriptions, one-off sales and free trials are handled in the product, a community space keeps members talking, live streaming is native, and its standout feature is the branded apps, iOS, Android and TV, that it builds for you with no code so a membership feels like a real product rather than a login page. Uscreen says it has helped over 4,000 creators launch subscription businesses, and reviewers score it 4.7 on G2 and credit its onboarding and free migration. For a creator building a paid membership, that is a serious platform and Gumlet is not the same thing.
There is a catch on each side. Gumlet's is that it is a host, not a direct-response player: it fires an ad pixel, but there is no sound-first autoplay, no sales-scored A/B test and no revenue attribution, so a paid-traffic VSL still cannot prove which traffic actually bought, and a January 2025 platform update knocked embedded videos offline for many accounts for 12 hours or more. Uscreen's is cost and commitment: Starter is $49 a month but caps at 100 subscribers, the branded apps come only with the $449-a-month App Essentials plan, a per-subscriber fee stacks on the base above Starter, and reviewers describe annual contracts they could not downgrade or cancel mid-term. And the catch they share matters most here: neither settles a split test on the sale or attributes revenue, so one more name belongs on this page, which we come to below.
Quick answer
Pick Gumlet if you want the cheapest branded way to host and embed a pre-recorded video sales letter, with Google and Meta retargeting pixels and in-player CTAs firing out of the box, and you will build the funnel and tracking around it yourself; pick Uscreen if you are building a subscription video membership as a business, with a Netflix-style catalog, native live streaming, a community and your own branded mobile and TV apps, and you accept a per-subscriber fee on top of the monthly base and an annual contract.
One more option belongs on this page for a specific reader. Gumlet fires an ad pixel but scores no split test on the actual sale, and Uscreen measures members and churn, not buyers, so neither settles a test on the cart-verified sale or posts that sale back to your ad platforms server-side. If your whole business is a paid-traffic sales letter and you want the test decided on the money, TrackPlay is the newer specialist built for exactly that, and we line it up beside both below.
- Gumlet. The cheapest branded host here, and the closer fit for a pre-recorded VSL. There is a Free Forever tier, then Creator at $6 a month billed annually drops Gumlet's own branding and turns on Google and Meta pixel tracking, and higher tiers add CRM integrations, VAST ad tags, dynamic watermarks and DRM. Unusually for a budget host, it ships the ad-platform retargeting pixels and in-player CTAs a paid-traffic marketer actually needs. The catch is that it is a host, not a direct-response player: no sales-scored A/B tests, no second-by-second retention heatmap and no revenue attribution, so the funnel and the proof of what buys are yours to build.
- Uscreen. A mature membership platform for turning a video library into a subscription business: a Netflix-style catalog, native live streaming, a built-in community and, on its App Essentials plan and up, branded iOS, Android and TV apps its team builds for you, with subscriptions, one-off sales and free trials handled in one place. The trade is cost and commitment: a per-subscriber fee stacks on top of the monthly base above Starter, the branded apps come only with the $449-a-month App Essentials plan, and reviewers report rigid annual contracts. It is not a VSL player either: no split test scored on the sale, no revenue attribution.
- TrackPlay. Best when you want the split test decided on the actual cart-verified sale and posted back to your ad platforms server-side. It scores tests on the verified sale with real statistics and fires that sale to Meta, TikTok and GA4, from $29 a month with a no-card free tier. It is narrow by design: not a general host or a membership platform, and very new.
Gumlet vs Uscreen at a glance
Prices and plan features checked on the vendors' own pages on 28 September 2026. TrackPlay is the direct-response specialist we line these two up against, so it wins the conversion rows and sits out the general-hosting ones.
| Feature | Gumlet | Uscreen | TrackPlay |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | The cheapest branded no-code host with ad pixels built in | A subscription video membership platform | A paid-traffic VSL player and attribution platform |
| Built for | Hosting and embedding pre-recorded video cheaply with pixels firing | Running a subscription video business with apps and community | Tying every play to the cart-verified sale |
| Starting price | Free Forever tier, then $6/mo (Creator, annual) | $49/mo Starter (monthly), 100-subscriber cap | $29/mo, billed by plays |
| Pricing model | Plan tiers; 3,000 GB bandwidth per paid tier then per-GB; DRM a $99/mo add-on | Monthly base plus a per-subscriber fee above Starter | Billed by plays, not bandwidth or seats |
| Free tier | Yes, Free Forever (60 storage mins) | No, a 14-day trial (no card) | Yes, no-card free plan (1,000 plays/mo, watermarked) |
| Branded mobile and TV apps | No | Yes, iOS, Android and TV apps built for you (App Essentials plan, $449/mo) | No |
| Subscriptions and memberships | None | Yes, subscriptions, one-off sales and free trials built in | No, direct-response cart focus |
| Community | No | Yes, a built-in community space | No |
| Live streaming | Yes, live streaming supported | Yes, native | No, on-demand VSL focus |
| In-video marketing hooks | Google and Meta pixels, in-player CTAs and lead forms | Marketing automations; no sound-first autoplay | Sound-first autoplay, timed CTAs, watch gates |
| Sales-scored A/B testing | No | No | Yes, decided on the cart-verified sale |
| Ad-platform tracking | Google and Meta pixels, client-side; not sale-scored | None built in | Server-side to Meta, TikTok and GA4, with dedup |
| Revenue attribution | No | No | Yes, revenue per play plus cart postbacks |
| Analytics | Custom viewer analytics; not sales-scored | Membership and marketing analytics; not sales-scored | Per-second retention, split by buyers vs non-buyers |
| Independent reviews | Thin and aging; a January 2025 outage | 4.7/5 on G2; per-subscriber-fee and contract complaints | Very new, thin outside proof, invite-only |
| Best for | Hosting a VSL cheaply with ad pixels, your own funnel | Building a subscription video membership business | Paid-traffic VSLs measured on the cart-verified sale |
Strengths and trade-offs
Gumlet gives you the cheapest branded delivery here with the ad pixels a VSL marketer wants already switched on, and expects you to build the funnel yourself. Uscreen gives a creator a whole subscription-membership business with apps, community and billing built in, at a higher price and with a per-subscriber fee and annual contract to watch. Here is what each does well and where each will bite.
Gumlet: what works, what to watch
What works
- Cheapest branded entry point here: a Free Forever tier, then $6/mo (Creator, billed annually) that removes branding and switches on Google and Meta pixel tracking
- Marketing hooks most cheap hosts skip: Meta and Google pixels, CRM integrations, VAST ad tags, and in-player CTAs and forms
- Strong protection for paid content: Widevine and FairPlay DRM, domain and geo blocking, dynamic watermarks and expiring access tokens
- Fast adaptive 4K and HDR playback on a global CDN, with 3,000 GB of bandwidth included on every paid tier
What to watch
- No direct-response conversion measurement: no sales-scored A/B tests, no watch-depth pixel to prove retention, and no revenue attribution, so a paid-traffic VSL cannot prove which traffic buys
- A January 2025 platform update knocked embedded videos offline for many accounts for 12 hours or more, and support reviews are inconsistent, some calling it days-slow
- DRM is a $99/mo add-on on top of the plan, and bandwidth and storage overages bill per GB, so a high-traffic offer outruns the cheap sticker price
- The dashboard has a learning curve and the WordPress and Elementor integrations are less polished than users want
- The third-party review base is thin and aging (Trustpilot sits at 78 reviews, only a handful in the last year)
Uscreen: what works, what to watch
What works
- Purpose-built for subscription memberships: a Netflix-style catalog, native live streaming and a community space in one platform, so members watch, chat and pay without you stitching three tools together
- Branded mobile and TV apps are the standout feature. Uscreen builds iOS, Android and TV apps for you with no code, and reviewers say the app makes a membership feel legitimate and lifts the share of viewing that happens in-app
- Real monetization built in: subscriptions, one-off sales and free trials, plus marketing automations and analytics, so you charge members directly instead of bolting on a separate cart
- Hands-on onboarding and free migration. A dedicated success manager walks you through setup, and reviewers repeatedly credit the team with making the launch of a site and app easy
- A 14-day free trial with no card, and a Starter plan at $49/mo, so you can test the membership model before committing real money
What to watch
- It is a membership platform, not a direct-response VSL player: there is no sound-first smart autoplay, no split test scored on the sale and no revenue attribution, so a paid-traffic sales letter still cannot prove which traffic actually bought from inside Uscreen
- The per-subscriber fee is the loudest complaint. Above Starter you pay $0.99 to $1.99 per subscriber on top of the monthly base, so a growing membership pays far more than the headline price, and reviewers describe the total take as high once fees stack up
- Annual contracts are rigid: Trustpilot reviewers report no mid-term downgrade or cancellation and being billed through the full term, so treat the annual commitment as firm and start on the monthly Starter plan to test
- Support and payouts can go quiet at the worst time. Reviewers report delayed payouts after cancelling and difficulty reaching a person to resolve a billing problem, so keep your own records and cancel in writing
- The entry price is not the price to run apps. Starter caps at 100 subscribers and mobile apps only begin on App Essentials at $449/mo, and the dashboard and marketing tools draw usability complaints, so budget and pilot for the plan you will actually need
TrackPlay: the paid-traffic VSL pick
Gumlet hands you a cheap branded host that fires an ad pixel, and Uscreen hands you a whole membership business platform, and both stop short of the same thing: neither settles a test on the sale, and neither posts that sale back to the ad platforms server-side. Gumlet's pixel fires on a page load or a play, not on the verified purchase, and it scores no split test; Uscreen's analytics measure members, marketing and churn, not buyers. If your whole business is a paid-traffic sales letter and you want the test decided on the money, a third tool belongs on the table. TrackPlay is a VSL player and analytics platform built for paid-traffic funnels. On the front end it holds attention with sound-first autoplay, timed CTAs and watch gates. On the back end it draws per-second retention split into buyers and non-buyers, with hook rate, hold rate and revenue per play, so you can see the exact seconds to cut or protect.
Where it goes further than either of these is what it settles the test on and how it reports the sale. Neither Gumlet nor Uscreen runs a split test scored on conversions; TrackPlay decides its split test on the cart-verified sale, with a real z-test, p-value and confidence interval, and runs every variant under one embed so your ad links and campaign learning never reset. The cart posts the verified sale back onto the play that earned it from seven direct-response processors, including ClickBank, ClickFunnels and Digistore24, server to server, and TrackPlay fires that conversion server-side to Meta, TikTok and GA4 so the ad platform learns from the actual purchase rather than a page-load pixel. It bills by plays rather than storage or subscribers, every feature ships on every paid plan, and there is a no-card free plan of 1,000 plays a month plus a 14-day trial, with paid plans from $29 a month.
What works
- Split tests are decided on the cart-verified sale, with a real z-test, p-value and confidence interval, and every variant runs under one embed so ad links and campaign learning never reset
- Server-side conversion tracking to Meta, TikTok and GA4 fires on the watch-time milestone you choose and dedupes browser and server events, so the ad platform optimizes on the actual sale rather than a page-load pixel
- Cart postbacks tie each sale to the play that earned it from seven direct-response carts, including ClickBank, ClickFunnels and Digistore24, server to server
- Per-second retention split into buyers and non-buyers, with hook rate, hold rate and revenue per play
- Every feature ships on every paid plan and billing is by plays, with a no-card free plan of 1,000 plays a month and a 14-day trial; paid plans start at $29 a month
What to watch
- Narrow by design: built for paid-traffic VSL conversion, it is not a general video host or a membership platform, so it has none of the cheap branded delivery and DRM of a Gumlet or the subscription billing, branded apps and community of an Uscreen, and is a poor fit if the video's job is general hosting or a subscription membership rather than a direct-response sale
- Very new, with thin outside proof: the testimonials are on its own site, there is little third-party review or Reddit footprint yet, and signup is currently invite-only, so you cannot lean on independent validation before you commit paid traffic. That is what you would expect of a platform this recent
Where TrackPlay is not the answer
It is narrow by design. TrackPlay is built for paid-traffic VSL conversion, not general hosting or a subscription business, so it is not a general video host or a B2B content library, and it has none of the cheap branded delivery and DRM of a Gumlet or the subscription billing, branded apps and community that make Uscreen a membership platform. If the video's job is content marketing, cheap general hosting, or the front door of a subscription membership rather than a direct-response sale, it is the wrong tool, and Gumlet or Uscreen is the better home for it. It is also very new, with thin outside proof: the testimonials are on its own site, there is little third-party review footprint yet, and signup is currently invite-only, which is what you would expect of a platform this recent. Pilot it on one funnel and reconcile the numbers against your own cart before you trust it with a proven offer.
Visit TrackPlay for the current plans and the free tier.
Pricing, tier by tier
Gumlet has a genuine Free Forever tier (60 minutes of storage), which is enough to test one video, and then the ladder is cheap. Creator is $6 a month billed annually, and it already earns its keep for a marketer: it removes Gumlet's own branding and switches on Google and Meta pixel tracking. Growth, around $19 a month, adds CRM integrations, and Business, around $99 a month, adds VAST ad tags, dynamic watermarks and H.265. Every paid tier includes 3,000 GB of bandwidth and then bills per GB of overage, and Widevine and FairPlay DRM is a separate $99-a-month add-on. So the sticker is low, but price the overage and the DRM add-on at the traffic and protection you actually need.
Uscreen is priced as a business tool, and there is no free plan, only a 14-day trial with no card. Starter is $49 a month, paid monthly, and caps you at 100 subscribers with a 10 percent fee on one-off sales. Growth is $149 a month on the annual rate ($199 monthly) and adds unlimited subscribers, but with a $1.99 per-subscriber fee stacked on top of the base. App Essentials, the plan that carries the branded mobile apps most creators come for, is $449 a month on the annual rate ($499 monthly) with a $0.99 per-subscriber fee, and includes onboarding and free migration. TV apps, the community space and API access sit on a custom plan above that. Live streaming beyond the first free hour is $15 an hour, and storage overage runs $99 per 100 hours.
The two meter completely different things, so which is cheaper depends on what you are doing. For hosting and embedding a pre-recorded sales letter, Gumlet is far the cheaper way in, because you pay a few dollars a month for a branded player with pixels and nothing for subscription billing, a community and an app build you would never touch. Uscreen's price buys the whole membership stack, which is worth real money if you are running a subscription business and dead weight if you only need to embed one video. Put a value on what you actually need before you compare the two numbers.
One cost note on each side. Gumlet's cheap tiers include 3,000 GB of bandwidth each and then bill per GB, and the DRM you may want for a paid course is a $99-a-month add-on on top of the plan, so a high-traffic offer outruns the low sticker. Uscreen's is the per-subscriber fee and the contract: above Starter you pay $0.99 to $1.99 for every active member on top of the monthly base, so a growing membership pays far more than the headline price, and reviewers on Trustpilot report annual terms they could not downgrade or cancel mid-term. Start on the monthly Starter plan to test the model before you commit to a year. Neither is a reason to rule the tool out; both are numbers to price before you commit.
TrackPlay prices differently again, and it is worth a line because it changes the model. It bills by plays rather than storage, seats or subscribers, so a high-traffic sales letter is metered on views watched, not gigabytes served, and every feature ships on every plan. Paid plans start at $29 a month, and there is a no-card free plan of 1,000 plays a month, watermarked, plus a 14-day trial of the paid features.
The verdict
Between these two, Gumlet wins for this site's core reader, the marketer hosting a pre-recorded video sales letter. It is the cheapest branded way here to store and serve that video, and it is the rare budget host that also fires the Google and Meta retargeting pixels a paid-traffic marketer needs and lets you drop CTAs and lead forms into the player. It stays out of the way of whatever funnel you build on top. Uscreen is a real and well-built platform, but it is a subscription-membership business platform: its subscription billing, community, live streaming and branded apps are built for a creator running a recurring-revenue membership, and none of that machinery helps a single sales letter sent cold traffic. Two honest limits stay attached to the Gumlet pick, and they are real. It fires a pixel but it is a host, not a player, so there is no sound-first autoplay, no sales-scored A/B and no revenue attribution, and all of that proof is yours to build. And a January 2025 platform update knocked embedded videos offline for many accounts for 12 hours or more, while its outside review base is thin and aging, so keep a fallback in mind.
Uscreen wins the other reader, and it is a real one. If you are building a subscription video business, a membership where people pay every month to watch a growing catalog, join a community and use your own branded app, Uscreen is built for exactly that and Gumlet is not. It handles subscriptions, one-off sales and free trials in one place, its team builds your iOS, Android and TV apps with no code, and reviewers credit its onboarding and free migration with making a launch easy. The trade is cost and commitment: the per-subscriber fee stacks on the base as you grow, the branded apps come only with the $449-a-month App Essentials plan, and the annual contract is firm, so start on the monthly Starter plan and price the fees at the membership size you actually expect.
The tie-breaker is simple. If you are hosting a pre-recorded sales letter as cheaply as possible with the ad pixels already firing and building the funnel yourself, buy Gumlet. If you are building a subscription membership as a business and you want the catalog, community and branded apps in one platform, buy Uscreen. And there is a third call for one specific reader: if your whole business is a paid-traffic sales letter and you want the split test settled on the actual cart-verified sale, not on a page-load pixel and not on viewing metrics, look at TrackPlay before you commit. Gumlet fires a pixel but scores no test on the sale and Uscreen scores none on it; TrackPlay decides its split test on the cart-verified sale with real statistics and posts that sale back to Meta, TikTok and GA4 server-side. It is the newer, narrower specialist and its outside proof is still thin, so pilot it on one funnel first.
Our pick
Gumlet
For hosting and embedding a pre-recorded video sales letter as cheaply as possible, Gumlet is the pick between these two. There is a Free Forever tier, then Creator at $6 a month billed annually removes the branding and switches on Google and Meta pixel tracking, and you get a fast adaptive 4K player with in-player CTAs and lead forms. Just remember what you are buying: a cheap branded host that fires an ad pixel, not a direct-response player. There are no sales-scored A/B tests, no watch-depth retention heatmap and no revenue attribution, so the split test and the proof of what buys are yours to build. Choose Uscreen instead if you are building a subscription membership as a business, where the catalog, community, live streaming and branded apps earn their higher price.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gumlet or Uscreen better?
Which is cheaper, Gumlet or Uscreen?
Does either one prove which paid traffic actually bought?
Can Gumlet run a video sales letter for paid traffic?
Can I run a paid-traffic VSL funnel on Uscreen?
Does Uscreen really build me mobile and TV apps?
What if I want the split test scored on the cart-verified sale?
Sources
Other sources
9 discussions and reviews read for this page. Quotes are excerpts; open a link to read the original in context.
Related reading
- Our full Gumlet review, the cheapest branded host with marketing pixels
- Our full Uscreen review, a membership platform judged against the sale
- Uscreen alternatives, ranked by whether they move sales
- Vimeo vs Uscreen: clean no-code hosting or a platform for a subscription video business
- Bunny Stream vs Uscreen: cheap usage-based delivery or a membership platform
- Gumlet vs Dacast: a cheap branded host with pixels or a broadcaster's live and OTT platform
- The best VSL players and conversion video software
- All head-to-head comparisons